Amazon
  • Introduction
  • Phone Interview I
    • 53.Reverse Words in a String
    • 31.Partition Array
  • Phone Interview II
    • 167.Add Two Numbers
    • 88.Lowest Common Ancestor
  • Onsite I
    • 655.Big Integer Addition
    • 221.Add Two Numbers II
  • Onsite II
    • 158.Two Strings Are Anagrams
    • 171.Anagrams
    • 386.Longest Substring with At Most K Distinct Characters
  • Onsite III
    • 479.Second Max of Array
    • 589.Connecting Graph
  • Onsite IV
    • 532.Reverse Pairs
  • 2022
    • OA
      • work simulation
      • Greyness
      • NearestRetailer
      • Sum of Scores of Subarray
      • StrengthOfPassword
      • ProductOf1
      • Move 0/1 InArray
      • Max deviation among all substrings
      • AWS power consumption
      • searchWordResultWord
      • maxOperationOfString
      • MinHealthGame
      • EarliestMonth
      • Package ship
      • RatingConsectiveDecresing
      • LinkedListSum
      • MovingBoxes
      • ValidString
      • MaxValueAfterRemovingFromString
      • Subtree with Maximum Average
    • VO
      • 2022.3
    • BQ
      • doc
      • 2022.4
      • Freq Question
      • 11大类BQ和Follow-ups
      • Page 1
      • BQ 100
      • 35 behavioral questions asked in 95% of Amazon interviews with examples
      • Page 2
      • 反向BQ
    • LP
      • LP-1
      • LP-2
    • SD
      • Design Amazon Prime Video Recommendation System
      • Amazon Order system
    • OOD
      • Linux Find Command
      • Amazon Locker
    • AWS Identity call
    • Interviews
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. 2022
  2. OA

LinkedListSum

https://leetcode.com/discuss/interview-question/1546673/Amazon-or-OA-or-LinkedListSum

PreviousRatingConsectiveDecresingNextMovingBoxes

Last updated 3 years ago

Was this helpful?

Give a linked list, which has even number of nodes, please return the maximum sum of PAIR
A pair means the node[i] and node[n-i], which n is linked list length.
example: [1,2,3,4,9,11]
1st pair sum: 1 + 11 = 13
2nd pair sum: 2 + 9 = 11
3rd pair sum: 3 + 4 = 7
Therefore, return 13

Please note that, you can only solve it with space complexity O(1)

Solution:

step 1 : count the number of nodes in the list - O(N) time step 2 : break the list from middle and reverse the second half of linked list - O(N) time and O(1) space if we ignore recursion step 3 : after step 2 above, the lists would be like 1-->4 and 2-->3 now, this is as good as traversing two lists simultaneously and computing the sums and checking for max - O(N) time

step 4 : if needed, restore the structure of the linked list back - O(N) time again

Same as

https://leetcode.com/problems/maximum-twin-sum-of-a-linked-list/